Last Updated: Aug 25, 2026
Read Time: 3 mins
I enjoy listening to the “Mike & Mike Show” on ESPN Radio during my morning commute. I remember on one show that they were discussing a lawsuit filed by NFL player, Mario Williams, against his ex-fiancee seeking the return of a $785,000 engagement ring. So they posed the question for each of their in-studio guests: Should the ex-fiancee get to keep the engagement ring?
Opinions varied, but the general consensus was that she should have to return the ring, unless the engagement ended because of infidelity by Williams. Interesting opinions. And actually not that far off from what the law actually requires.
Engagement Ring–Tennessee Law
In Tennessee, the Court of Appeals addressed this precise issue in 2007. In the case of Crippen v. Campbell, 2007 WL 2768076, the Court held that under Tennessee law (as is the case in most states) an engagement ring is a “conditional gift” by the donor that must be returned by the donee if the condition (i.e. the marriage) is not ultimately satisfied. Moreover, the Court further recognized that while in some jurisdictions the donee would be entitled to keep the ring if the donor was at fault for the demise of the engagement, the rule in Tennessee was not dependent on fault. In other words, in Tennessee at least, the fiancee would have to return the ring no matter what.
Specifically, the Court summarized its holding as follows:
In summary, we hold that an engagement ring is given in contemplation of marriage, and, as such, is impliedly a conditional gift. If marriage, for whatever reason, does not ensue, ownership of the ring never vests in the donee and the donor is entitled to the return of the ring. We recognize that there are cases holding that a donee is entitled to retain an engagement ring when the donor is responsible for the failed engagement. See, e.g., White v. Finch, 209 A.2d 199, 201 (Conn. Cir.Ct.1964) (“where an engagement is broken owing to the fault of the donor, he may not recover the ring”). We decline to follow these cases because we believe the rule adopted by us is more in keeping with the essence of what occurs, and what is contemplated, at the time of an engagement. If and when that which the parties contemplated – the marriage – does not occur, the engagement ring goes back to the one who gave it.
Obviously, this only applies if the couple breaks up before they get married, and has no bearing in a divorce situation. Indeed, once the underlying gift condition is met — i.e. a wedding takes place — the ring belongs to the donee for good.
Questions?
If you have questions about a dispute involving personal property, give us a call at 901-372-5003. We assist personal injury, estate planning, business litigation, and business organization clients in the greater Memphis and Nashville areas. Cities covered include:
Patterson Bray
20+ Years of Experience
24/7 Call Answering
Nashville & Memphis Offices
Reach out to Patterson Bray and an attorney will follow up with you soon.
Posted on Google
Nancy Wallace2 days agoTrustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
If you are looking to do estate planning, go with Patterson Bray! They are excellent to deal with!Posted on Google
Cheryl Adkins3 days agoWe loved the staff at Patterson Bray. Everyone was very professional. Judith was very thorough and explained everything extremely well. We would recommend Patterson Bray to anyone.Posted on Google
Hailey Wade27 days agoPatterson Bray PLLC did an excellent job with my grandmother's estate planning, and made everything easy to understand! She recommended them to a friend who went and is also very satisfied with their services.Posted on Google
Deb Clark32 days agoMy experience with this firm, particularly Judith Denham has been truly exceptional. From the consultation to the finish, the attention to detail, listening and responding to my needs. My documents were completed timely and professionally. I highly recommend Patterson Bray.Posted on Google
Tanya White32 days agoPattersonBray Estate Planning was an incredible firm to work with setting up our Trust. Judith Denham was thorough, very smart, and personable as she patiently explained each part. Gabby put together a very professional beautiful binder for us to have, and has answered questions we have had since then. I am so glad they were recommended to us, and we had them to walk us through this procedure.Posted on Google
Charmaine Sego33 days agoPatterson Bray did a great job with my mother's trust.Posted on Google
Phil Chamberlain49 days agoPatterson Bray PLLC - first class lawyers.Posted on Google
Catherine McGee69 days agoHeath Taylor was a genuine joy to work with during my divorce: straight forward, professional, and knowledgeable. I do hope I never have the need to acquire more legal help, but if I do, he'll be my first call. Thank you for everything, Heath!!Posted on Google
Marva Johnson75 days agoI FOUND PATTERSON BRAY AND JUDITH DENHAM TO BE PROFESSIONAL, VERY THOROUGH, AND PERSONAL. I DID NOT FEEL LIKE A CLIENT, BUT A PERSON. I AM SO IMPRESSED WITH THEM, ESPECIALLY JUDITH AND GABBY. VERY GRATEFUL FOR ASSISTANCE. M.JOHNSONPosted on Google
Pam Nicole76 days agoWe set up a trust with Judith, at Patterson Bray and we received excellent service. Everything was explained thoroughly and everyone was very friendly and professional. I would definitely use her and the firm again, if needed.
comes next.
