Last Updated: Jul 1, 2026
Read Time: 4 mins
Every Custody Decision Comes Back to One Standard
Tennessee law does not simply divide parenting time evenly by default. Under Tennessee Code Annotated Section 36-6-106, every custody determination must be based on the best interest of the child, and the court is directed to order an arrangement that permits both parents to enjoy the maximum participation possible in the child’s life, consistent with a detailed list of statutory factors, the location of each parent’s residence, and the child’s need for stability. This standard applies whether parents are divorcing, were never married, or are revisiting an existing custody arrangement years later, since the same statutory framework governs every one of these situations without exception.
The Factors Courts Are Required to Weigh
The statute lists more than a dozen specific factors a judge must consider, though not every factor applies equally in every case, and judges have significant discretion in deciding how much weight each one deserves given a family’s particular circumstances. Several of the most influential include:
- The strength, nature, and stability of the child’s relationship with each parent
- Each parent’s past performance and potential for future performance of parenting responsibilities going forward
- The importance of continuity and stability, and the length of time the child has already lived in a stable environment
- Each parent’s willingness to encourage and support a close relationship between the child and the other parent
- Any evidence of abuse or a parent’s failure to pay court-ordered child support consistently for three years or more
A Franklin child custody lawyer can help identify which of these particular factors are likely to carry the most weight given a specific family’s circumstances.
Why “Maximum Participation” Does Not Mean Equal Time
Many parents assume the phrase “maximum participation” guarantees a 50/50 split, but Tennessee courts do not read the statute that way. The requirement is to maximize both parents’ involvement to the extent consistent with the child’s best interest, not to mandate an equal division of time regardless of the underlying facts. The team at Patterson Bray PLLC helps clients understand this distinction early, since misunderstanding it can lead to unrealistic expectations about what a parenting plan will actually look like. Going into negotiations expecting an automatic even split, only to discover that the court will weigh substantially more than just raw parenting time, can catch a parent off guard at exactly the wrong moment.
How These Factors Play Out in Practice
Judges weigh these factors together rather than applying any single one in isolation, which means the same fact can carry different weight depending on everything else in the case. A parent’s demanding work travel schedule, for example, might matter far less if that parent has historically handled the bulk of a child’s medical appointments and school involvement despite that schedule. A Franklin child custody lawyer can help present these details to the court in a way that reflects the full picture rather than an isolated snapshot. Two parents can present the same basic underlying facts and still reach very different custody outcomes depending on how those facts are framed and supported with evidence at the hearing.
Preparing for a Custody Determination
Because the statute directs courts to weigh so many overlapping factors, preparation matters enormously in a contested custody case. Documenting involvement in a child’s daily life, from school communications to medical records, well before a case is ever filed can make a meaningful difference once a judge is weighing the statutory factors against each other. Parents who wait until a dispute is already well underway to start gathering this kind of documentation often find themselves reconstructing a history that would have been much easier to capture accurately in real time.
If you are facing a custody dispute in Franklin, speak with our team about how these factors might apply to your family’s specific situation.
Patterson Bray
20+ Years of Experience
24/7 Call Answering
Nashville & Memphis Offices
Reach out to Patterson Bray and an attorney will follow up with you soon.
Posted on Google Ashton HTrustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google. We’ve had an outstanding experience with this firm across multiple needs, including trust document creation and forming an LLC. From start to finish, they were professional and proactive. They made sure we understood every step of the process and checked in to confirm our preferences, as well as offering thoughtful alternatives whenever something didn’t feel like a good fit. That level of communication and attention to detail is rare. Every interaction built confidence that we were in the right hands. They not only handled the legal work effectively, but also made the entire process feel manageable and well-guided. We cannot recommend them highly enough and will absolutely continue using them in the future.Posted on Google Judy sTrustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google. Attorney Judith Denham and her legal assistant, Gaby Wright, made a great team in creating a trust for me. Judith explained everything in a clear, cohesive way and set up a trust in a timely manner. She gave me a binder for my trust with all the legal paperwork sectioned off in tabs so I can find things easily. When I had questions, Judith and Gaby were responsive and helpful. I give them my highest recommendation.Posted on Google Nancy JTrustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google. I am so pleased with my new relationship with Judith Dunham and her fantastic team! They helped me create a Trust and end of life documents that I understand and feel very comfortable with. It’s a relief to have this life task well updated and I’m very grateful to Judith, Gabby and the whole team! If you’re looking for very professional, reliable assistance with these type documents, they are wonderful!Posted on Google Davis WTrustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google. This website was clear and easy to navigate. It does a good job of explaining services and further supports itself with testimonials.Posted on Google MTrustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google. I had a few (what I would consider) silly questions to ask the legal team at Patterson Bray PLLC. Having very little knowledge of the situation I needed clarity on, I had no idea what to expect. I was met with nothing but professionalism and warmth from attorney Rachel Meadows. She gave me information I didn’t even remotely consider, and my questions were thoroughly answered without judgement. She could have certainly given me less detailed responses, but I felt that she genuinely cared about my situation, and appreciated her taking me seriously. I’m extremely impressed with the service I received from this law firm and will happily recommend it.Posted on Google Zack CTrustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google. After bringing up my specific legal issue, I was quickly and throughly informed on how to get started with hiring an attorney as well as informed on whether or not I have a claim to begin with. They answered all of my questions professionally to a point that I feel extremely satisfied with using their services.Posted on Google Dennis nTrustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google. Very clearly explained their pricing structure. Rachel was wonderful to speak with.Posted on Google Marilyn ATrustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google. Carlisle Dale was very helpful with Estate Planning; outlined strategy, estimates and followed-up promptly with well organized deliverables. Thank you!
comes next.