From zoning and land use issues to city ordinances and code violations, Patterson Bray has the expertise to deal with municipal matters. We represent individuals, counties, towns and cities on a variety of governmental issues, including:
Land Use
Labor Law
Code Enforcement
Zoning Issues
Eminent Domain
Real Estate Transactions
Contract Disputes
For more information, please submit an online request for a Free Case Review, or call to set up a consultation at 901-372-5003.
Understanding Eminent Domain
Generally speaking, the property that you own is yours until you decide to dispose of it by selling or giving it away. However, sometimes a government project intended for the public good requires the appropriation of privately held property. The Fifth Amendment of the United States Constitution allows the government to take and use property under certain conditions according to the legal principle of eminent domain.
Eminent domain is difficult to understand because it seems to go against common sense. Here are some questions that often arise about it.
What Property Is Subject to Eminent Domain?
Eminent domain can be, and is perhaps most often, used by the government to seize physical property, such as land and buildings, for public use. For example, it has been used to clear the way for the construction of interstate highways and other public works projects. However, other tangible products may be subject to eminent domain, such as dirt, timber, water, and rock used in road construction. The airspace over an area of land is subject to eminent domain, as is intellectual property, such as copyrights and patents.
What Do Property Owners Get Out of It?
The Fifth Amendment is very clear that if a property is subject to eminent domain, the government must provide the owner just compensation in exchange. This must be provided before the property is seized. Just compensation could involve a monetary payment for the fair market value of the property.
However, the determination of just compensation isn’t necessarily that straightforward. For example, the government could seize and use the property only temporarily, returning it to the owner afterward. Temporarily invoking eminent domain doesn’t relieve the government of the responsibility to provide just compensation, but it can make the determination more difficult.
What Can the Property Be Used For?
The Fifth Amendment specifies that private property seized through eminent domain must be put to “public use.” Examples may include a new road, public utilities, a city park, etc. However, the definition of a public use isn’t very specifically defined in the Constitution. Over the years, the Supreme Court has applied the Fifth Amendment more broadly, making it easier for corporations to seize public land for research facilities and factories, which some consider legal abuse.
What If You Don’t Want To Give Up the Property?
The law requires that before seizure of property can occur, condemnation procedures must take place in court. These proceedings give the owner a chance to challenge the forced sale. Inverse condemnation is a remedy for when you do not receive just compensation for your property.
You don’t have to face eminent domain proceedings alone. Contact our municipal and government attorneys at Patterson Bray if you have a dispute with the government over your property. For more information, please submit an online request for a Free Case Review, or call to set up a consultation at 901-372-5003.
Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
We’ve had an outstanding experience with this firm across multiple needs, including trust document creation and forming an LLC.
From start to finish, they were professional and proactive. They made sure we understood every step of the process and checked in to confirm our preferences, as well as offering thoughtful alternatives whenever something didn’t feel like a good fit. That level of communication and attention to detail is rare.
Every interaction built confidence that we were in the right hands. They not only handled the legal work effectively, but also made the entire process feel manageable and well-guided.
We cannot recommend them highly enough and will absolutely continue using them in the future.
Posted on Google
Judy s
Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
Attorney Judith Denham and her legal assistant, Gaby Wright, made a great team in creating a trust for me. Judith explained everything in a clear, cohesive way and set up a trust in a timely manner. She gave me a binder for my trust with all the legal paperwork sectioned off in tabs so I can find things easily. When I had questions, Judith and Gaby were responsive and helpful. I give them my highest recommendation.
Posted on Google
Nancy J
Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
I am so pleased with my new relationship with Judith Dunham and her fantastic team! They helped me create a Trust and end of life documents that I understand and feel very comfortable with. It’s a relief to have this life task well updated and I’m very grateful to Judith, Gabby and the whole team! If you’re looking for very professional, reliable assistance with these type documents, they are wonderful!
Posted on Google
Davis W
Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
This website was clear and easy to navigate. It does a good job of explaining services and further supports itself with testimonials.
Posted on Google
M
Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
I had a few (what I would consider) silly questions to ask the legal team at Patterson Bray PLLC. Having very little knowledge of the situation I needed clarity on, I had no idea what to expect.
I was met with nothing but professionalism and warmth from attorney Rachel Meadows. She gave me information I didn’t even remotely consider, and my questions were thoroughly answered without judgement. She could have certainly given me less detailed responses, but I felt that she genuinely cared about my situation, and appreciated her taking me seriously.
I’m extremely impressed with the service I received from this law firm and will happily recommend it.
Posted on Google
Zack C
Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
After bringing up my specific legal issue, I was quickly and throughly informed on how to get started with hiring an attorney as well as informed on whether or not I have a claim to begin with. They answered all of my questions professionally to a point that I feel extremely satisfied with using their services.
Posted on Google
Dennis n
Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
Very clearly explained their pricing structure. Rachel was wonderful to speak with.
Posted on Google
Marilyn A
Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
Carlisle Dale was very helpful with Estate Planning; outlined strategy, estimates and followed-up promptly with well organized deliverables. Thank you!